Hi Richard, all, The change is now implemented with one difference: The reference is to "RFC4646 or its successor" instead of "BCP 47 or its successors" (since the definition refers to RFC4646 not BCP47). See: http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/itstagset.html#EX-lang-definition-1 Please let us know within 2 weeks if you are satisfied. If we don't hear from you, we will assume this issue as closed. Thanks, -yves -----Original Message----- From: public-i18n-its-request@w3.org [mailto:public-i18n-its-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Richard Ishida Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 11:56 AM To: 'Felix Sasaki' Cc: www-i18n-comments@w3.org; public-i18n-core@w3.org; public-i18n-its@w3.org Subject: RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Example 33 Personal response: But it is still not implemented, as far as I can tell. RIReceived on Tuesday, 12 September 2006 19:09:36 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 1 October 2008 10:18:51 GMT