W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-core@w3.org > July to September 2006

RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Make the application of legacy ruby clearer

From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 20:02:40 +0100
To: "'Felix Sasaki'" <fsasaki@w3.org>
Cc: <www-i18n-comments@w3.org>, <public-i18n-core@w3.org>, <public-i18n-its@w3.org>
Message-ID: <00ef01c6d5d4$db770030$6401a8c0@w3cishida>

Personal response:

You copied my text so verbatim that you kept the typo ;-)

do no contain  ->  do not contain

RI


============
Richard Ishida
Internationalization Lead
W3C (World Wide Web Consortium)

http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/
http://www.w3.org/International/
http://people.w3.org/rishida/blog/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ishida/
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Felix Sasaki [mailto:fsasaki@w3.org] 
> Sent: 11 September 2006 04:30
> To: ishida@w3.org
> Cc: www-i18n-comments@w3.org; public-i18n-core@w3.org; 
> public-i18n-its@w3.org
> Subject: Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Make the application of 
> legacy ruby clearer
> 
> Hello i18n core,
> 
> This is a reply on behalf of the i18n ITS working group. See also
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3506 for our discussion.
> 
> Thank you very much for your comment. We agreed to implement 
> it. Please have a look at 
> http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/itstagset.html#r
> uby-implementation
> , especially example 36.
> 
> 
> 
> Please let us know within 2 weeks if you are satisfied. If we 
> don't hear  from you , we will assume this issue as closed.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Felix
> 
> 
> ishida@w3.org wrote:
> > Comment from the i18n review of:
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-its-20060518/
> > 
> > Comment 36
> > At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0606-its/
> > Editorial/substantive: E
> > Owner: RI
> > 
> > Location in reviewed document:
> > 6.6.3
> > 
> > Comment: 
> > It is very poorly explained what the difference is between 
> this and the situation described in the last para of 6.6.2.
> > 
> > 
> > How about:
> > 
> > 
> > "Where legacy formats do no contain ruby markup conformant 
> to [Ruby-TR], it is still possible to associate ruby text 
> with a specified range of document content using the rubyRule 
> element."
> > 
> > 
> > Note also s/and there one wants/and where one wants/
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 11 September 2006 19:03:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 1 October 2008 10:18:51 GMT