Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Marks terms and meanings

Hello i18n core,

This is a reply on behalf of the i18n ITS working group. See also
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3493 for our discussion.

Thank you very much for your comment. We agreed to implement it. Please
have a look at
http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/itstagset.html#terminology-definition
.


Please let us know within 2 weeks if you are satisfied. If we don't hear
 from you , we will assume this issue as closed.

Regards,

Felix

ishida@w3.org wrote:
> Comment from the i18n review of:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-its-20060518/
> 
> Comment 17
> At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0606-its/
> Editorial/substantive: E
> Owner: RI
> 
> Location in reviewed document:
> 6.4.1
> 
> Comment: 
> "The terminology data category is used to mark terms."
> 
> 
> Surely, as a definition, this must say 'The terminology data category is used to mark terms and associate them with definitions'?
> 
> 
> FS: You will see at http://www.w3.org/TR/its/#terminology-markup that you can use the terminology data category for just identifying terms. All attributes for adding further information (e.g., but *not only* about definitions) are optional.
> 
> 
> I18n: Then let's reword the proposed text to Surely, as a definition, this must say 'The terminology data category is used to mark terms and optionally associate them with information, such as definitions'?
> 
> 
> (We have reduced this comment to editorial.)
> 
> 
> 
>