Hello i18n core, This is a reply on behalf of the i18n ITS working group. See also http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3487 for our discussion . Thank you very much for your comment. We agreed to implement it. Please have a look at http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/itstagset.html#translatability-implementation . Please let us know within 2 weeks if you are satisfied. If we don't hear from you , we will assume this issue as closed. Regards, Felix ishida@w3.org wrote: > Comment from the i18n review of: > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-its-20060518/ > > Comment 8 > At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0606-its/ > Editorial/substantive: E > Owner: RI > > Location in reviewed document: > 6.2.2 > > Comment: > The examples show the value of translate being set to 'yes', but since this is the default anyway, this is unnecessary and confusing. Please substitute examples that indicate where translation is not required. > > > >Received on Monday, 11 September 2006 01:01:35 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 1 October 2008 10:18:51 GMT