[Comment on ITS WD] Example 31 lacks rp

From: <ishida@w3.org> Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 20:32:33 +0000 To: www-i18n-comments@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org Message-Id: <20060711193233.E8BFD4F519@homer.w3.org> · This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 1 October 2008 10:18:51 GMT

Comment from the i18n review of:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-its-20060518/

Comment 33
At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0606-its/
Editorial/substantive: E
Owner: RI

Location in reviewed document:
6.6.2

Comment: 
I can't see any good reason why one should omit the <rp> markup in Example 31, but I can see very good reasons for including it. Please add.