Comment from the i18n review of: http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-its-20060518/ Comment 46 At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0606-its/ Editorial/substantive: S/E Owner: RI Location in reviewed document: 5.6 Comment: Should this be identified by global rules as language information? If not, we should explain why in the language information data category section. FS: The current definition 6.7.1. says "The element langRule is used to express that a given piece of content(selected by the attribute langPointer) is used to express language information as defined by [RFC 3066bis]." I would add a note saying "Applying this data category to xml:lang attributes does not make sense since xml:lang is already defined interms of RFC 3066 or its successor". If that would address your concern, please add it to your comment. I18n: We propose a slight alteration to the above: Applying the langRule data category to xml:lang attributes using global rules is not necessary, since ...Received on Tuesday, 11 July 2006 19:39:45 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 1 October 2008 10:18:51 GMT