RE: On citing Unicode

> *This point about *assigned* code points is the crux of my argument.
> If it is wrong, and "code point" includes unassinged code 
> ponts, we don't need this extra text in SPARQL.

The Unicode Standard defines 'code point' as "Any value in the Unicode code
space" (p.64).  ie. you can have unassigned code points.

Note that CharMod refers to the full range of Unicode code points as "from
U+0000 to U+10FFFF inclusive." http://www.w3.org/TR/charmod/#C070

RI

============
Richard Ishida
Internationalization Lead
W3C (World Wide Web Consortium)

http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/
http://www.w3.org/International/
http://people.w3.org/rishida/blog/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ishida/
 

Received on Tuesday, 14 March 2006 12:03:26 UTC