Comment from the i18n review of: http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-mobile-bp-20060113/ Comment 7 At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0602-mwbp10/ Editorial/substantive: E Owner: FS Location in reviewed document: Sec.2.3 [http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-mobile-bp-20060113/#iddiv2102173616] Comment: In some character encodings like UTF-8, scripts with a similar number of characters (e.g. latin versus indic scripts) vary in space requirements. To avoid high bandwidth / cost related to scripts, you might propose for such cases the use of the compression scheme for unicode [http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr6/] .Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2006 16:44:03 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 1 October 2008 10:18:50 GMT