Re: I18n comment: syntax document

Hi Iah, all,

On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 05:02:30 +0900, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote:

>
> On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 ishida@w3.org wrote:
>>
>> Comment: Please add a link to the Syntax document, and make it a
>> dependency.
>
> This is an official comment on behalf of the CSS working group.
>
> I do not understand your request. As Bjoern wrote:
>
>> > In #23, what do you mean by making the syntax module a
>> > dependency? It is perfectly reasonable to use CSS Selectors
>> > without other parts of the CSS syntax, e.g. as selection
>> > mechanism in an API, and the draft refers to the module only
>> > to point out that that module defines a namespace prefix
>> > binding mechanism.
>
>
> On Mon, 23 Jan 2006, Felix Sasaki wrote:
>>
>> see my reply to a mail from Daniel about the unclearness of dependency
>> of this draft on CSS.
>
> We do not understand why it seems unclear.
>
>
> I have made no change to the spec in response to this comment. In the
> likely event that this does not satisfy your request, please explain
> exactly what it is you would like to see, with your reasoning.
>
> Cheers,


We discussed your reply and decided to accept your resolution.
Thank you. Regards, Felix.