W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-core@w3.org > January to March 2006

Re: I18n comment: xml and namespaces version

From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 23:38:41 +0900
To: www-style@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.s3t5mrpax1753t@ibm-60d333fc0ec>

On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 19:36:22 +0900, <ishida@w3.org> wrote:

>
> Comment from the i18n review of:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-css3-selectors-20051215/
>
> Comment 5
> At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0601-css3-selectors/
> Editorial/substantive: S
> Location in reviewed document:
> Sec. 6.1.1  
> [http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-css3-selectors-20051215/#typenmsp]
>
> Comment:
> Which version of XML Namespaces (and XML) is supported by the document?
>
>
>
>> From: Bjoern Hoehrmann [mailto:derhoermi@gmx.net]
>> Sent: 20 January 2006 15:22
>
>> In #5, what would it mean for CSS Selectors to "support" any
>> specific version of Namespaces in XML?
>
>
>> From: Daniel Glazman
>> [mailto:daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com]
>
>> #5 the spec does not rely on a given version of XML. It can select
>>     in any kind of markup tgree-based language.
>

and that is the reason why it should say what happens if there is a clash
in versions. Or it should add a note to warn the users of such clashes,
e.g. saying

"This specification does not provide mechanisms to avoid clashes which
might occur due to different versions of markup languages. An example are
clashes between different versions of XML.
Received on Monday, 23 January 2006 14:39:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 1 October 2008 10:18:50 GMT