RE: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Smyth

I think this is 'Partially accepted' rather than 'Rejected', if you have
such a  category ?
 
Thanks, anyway. If you don't hear from other members of the i18n core
working group, please regard this issue as closed.

RI


============
Richard Ishida
Internationalization Lead
W3C (World Wide Web Consortium)

http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/
http://www.w3.org/International/
http://people.w3.org/rishida/blog/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ishida/


 


________________________________

	From: Baggia Paolo [mailto:paolo.baggia@loquendo.com] 
	Sent: 26 May 2006 15:25
	To: www-voice@w3.org
	Cc: Baggia Paolo; Richard Ishida
	Subject: Re: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Smyth
	
	
	 
	Issue R103-32
	
	Proposed Classification: Clarification / Typo / Editorial 
	
	Resolution: Reject 
	
	We can clarify the Section 5.4 [1] by splitting the example in two
	parts. First the seed/cede examples and then the Smyth/Smith. We
believe
	that PLS is most valuable for addressing the difficult cases that
arise
	in human speech. We see a value to maintaining complex examples to
	illustrate how an author might address these complex cases. 
	
	Please indicate whether you are satisfied with the VBWG's
resolution,
	whether you think there has been a misunderstanding, or whether you
wish
	to register an objection. 
	
	
	[1]
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-pronunciation-lexicon-20060131/#S5.4 
	
	Paolo Baggia, editor PLS spec.
	
	
------------------------------------------------------------------------
	---
	From: 
	Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 17:52:08 +0000
	To: www-voice@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org 
	Message-Id: <20060321175207.4CCFA4EFDE@homer.w3.org> 
	
	
	Comment from the i18n review of:
	http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-pronunciation-lexicon-20060131/
	
	Comment 32
	At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0603-pls10/
	Editorial/substantive: E
	Owner: RI
	
	Location in reviewed document:
	5.4
	
	Comment: 
	I think the Smyth example just confuses things at the beginning of
the
	section and in the example. It is an example of something that is
both a
	homograph and homophone at the same time - for which there appears
to be
	no good solution. I would just add a reference to the fact that such
	things exist after the example in 5.4, and perhaps use one of the
	examples in 5.3 rather than the Smyth one.
	
	
	Gruppo Telecom Italia - Direzione e coordinamento di Telecom Italia
S.p.A.
	
	================================================
	CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
	This message and its attachments are addressed solely to the persons
	above and may contain confidential information. If you have received
	the message in error, be informed that any use of the content hereof
	is prohibited. Please return it immediately to the sender and delete
	the message. Should you have any questions, please send an e_mail to
	<mailto:webmaster@telecomitalia.it>webmaster@telecomitalia.it. Thank
you
	<http://www.loquendo.com>www.loquendo.com
	================================================

Received on Wednesday, 14 June 2006 15:24:18 UTC