[Fwd: Re: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: Indicating language changes in links]

FYI

Forwarded message 1

  • From: dom@w3.org <dom@w3.org>
  • Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 16:56:24 +0000 (GMT)
  • Subject: Re: [MWBP 1.0] i18n comment: Indicating language changes in links
  • To: <fsasaki@w3.org>
  • Cc: public-bpwg-comments@dolph.w3.org
  • Message-Id: <20060412165624.5B7936638C@dolph.w3.org>
 Dear <fsasaki@w3.org>,

The Mobile Web Best Practice Working Group has reviewed the comments you
sent [1] on the Last Call Working Draft [2] of the Mobile Web Best
Practices 1.0 published on 13 January 2006 Thank you for having taken the
time to review the document and to send us comments!

This message holds the disposition of the said comments on which the
Working Group has agreed. This disposition has been implemented in the new
version of the document available at:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-mobile-bp-20060412/

Please review it carefully and let us know if you agree with it or not
before 3 May 2006. In case of disagreement, you are requested to provide a
specific solution for or a path to a consensus with the Working Group. If
such a consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the opportunity to
raise a formal objection which will then be reviewed by the Director
during the transition of this document to the next stage in the W3C
Recommendation Track.

Thanks,

For the Mobile Web Best Practice Working Group,
Philipp Hoschka
Dominique Hazaƫl-Massieux
W3C Staff Contacts

 1. http://www.w3.org/mid/20060222165023.EF238439D@toro.w3.mag.keio.ac.jp
 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-mobile-bp-20060113/


=====

Your comment on 5.2.7 Link Target Identification:


Comment from the i18n review of:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-mobile-bp-20060113/

Comment 14
At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0602-mwbp10/
Editorial/substantive: S
Owner: FS
Location in reviewed document:
Sec. 5.2.7
[http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-mobile-bp-20060113/#iddiv3102405752]

Comment:
 
Please mention that if in the content there is a link to something which
is not in the same language, it would be good to make it explicit.


Working Group Resolution:
We don't think this has a specific mobile interpretation

----

Received on Thursday, 13 April 2006 08:21:54 UTC