- From: Bobby Tung <bobbytung@wanderer.tw>
- Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 00:19:13 +0800
- To: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com>
- Cc: Jonathan Kew <jfkthame@gmail.com>, "dholbert@mozilla.com" <dholbert@mozilla.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, CJK discussion <public-i18n-cjk@w3.org>
> Sorry for repeating questions but are you sure on #1? I remember you > put <span>s within <rt> to place Bopomofo tone marks correctly. Was > that issue solved somehow and you no longer need such markups within > <rt>? Mostly from curiosity but can you let us know how you solve > that? Ah, I used nested ruby to put tone mark aside, but I got some negative feedback. We had made a prototype Bopomofo ruby mark-up tool and do not use nested ruby anymore [1]. I think layout engine is the most reasonable way to put tone mark to right place. >> 2. If yes to #1, do you want those elements layout in vertical flow, >> or horizontal flow? I think inter-character only help Bopomofo alignment in horizontal writing. In vertical writing, will ruby-merge: separate; make sure ruby texts within the base? If so, that's ok. >> 3. Do you have any use cases of having Latin characters inside of <rt> >> for inter-character? No. > I'm asking, because if all answers to these 3 questions are really no, > there's another possible way to handle inter-character just like > text-combine-upright, though I'm not sure if implementers are happy to > do so. [1]: https://www.moedict.tw/lab/ruby/ Bobby > Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gmail.com> 於 2014年12月15日 下午11:46 寫道： > > On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Bobby Tung <bobbytung@wanderer.tw> wrote: >> 1. Do you have any use cases of having elements inside <rt> for >> inter-character, or just having text suffices the use cases? >> >> >> >> >> Quick reply, no. > > > > # BTW, I added pubic-i18n-cjk, I should have done so at the first place > > /koji
Received on Monday, 15 December 2014 16:19:51 UTC