- From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 15:10:07 +0100
- To: kawabata taichi <kawabata.taichi@gmail.com>, CJK discussion <public-i18n-cjk@w3.org>
Hi, On 18/03/2014 12:01 , kawabata taichi wrote: > The Step 13 of [1] (13. If root has a ruby element ancestor, then abort > these steps.) prohibits the the processing of nested ruby. > > However, nested ruby feature is already implemented in Chrome and > Safari, and it is likely that someone in the world may already use it. > Also, it is unclear that what would be the expected result of > "aborting" the process. > > As of it, I think that Step 13 of [1] may be no longer necessary, and > would like to propose to remove the step 13 from the specification. I would be happy to remove step 13. However, I am curious about the support you mention in Chrome and Safari, can you please point me to a test showing that in practice? Thanks! -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Tuesday, 18 March 2014 14:10:21 UTC