public-i18n-cjk@w3.org from January to March 2014 by date

Monday, 31 March 2014

• [HTML5 Ruby] Tag omission rules for rt and rtc (was A typo and a question for Tag omission rules Koji Ishii
• Re: Bopomofo Ruby layout hack Koji Ishii

Wednesday, 26 March 2014

• I18N-ISSUE-253: Re: Figure 32 typos [klreq] 김현영

Thursday, 27 March 2014

• Re: [HTML5 Ruby] A typo and a question for Tag omission rules Koji Ishii

Wednesday, 26 March 2014

• [HTML5 Ruby] A typo and a question for Tag omission rules Koji Ishii
• Re: I18N-ISSUE-254: RE: Parentheses and spaces in Fig 32 [klreq] Richard Ishida
• I18N-ISSUE-254: RE: Parentheses and spaces in Fig 32 [klreq] corolla.kim@gmail.com
• I18N-ISSUE-252 Re: Minor Errors in Requirements for Hangul Text Layout and Typography corolla.kim@gmail.com
• [Bug 24369] Reason for ‘ruby base span’ attribute to come back bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Tuesday, 25 March 2014

• [Bug 24369] Reason for ‘ruby base span’ attribute to come back bugzilla@jessica.w3.org
• [Bug 24369] Reason for ‘ruby base span’ attribute to come back bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Friday, 21 March 2014

• [CSSWG][css-writing-modes-3] Published CR of CSS Writing Modes L3 fantasai

Wednesday, 19 March 2014

• [HTML5 Ruby] Variable "Current Annotaions Range" ... May be reduced? kawabata taichi
• [HTML5 Ruby] Should we disallow <rp> appeared between <rt>? kawabata taichi
• [HTML5 Ruby] Step 20.2 of Segmentation & Categorization ... Really necessary? kawabata taichi
• [public-i18n-cjk] <none> kawabata taichi
• Re: [HTML5 Ruby] <Segmentation & Categorization> Step 13 really necessary? kawabata taichi
• [HTML5 Ruby] 2+ ruby annotation containers at commiting a ruby segment. kawabata taichi

Tuesday, 18 March 2014

• Re: [HTML5 Ruby] <Segmentation & Categorization> Step 13 really necessary? Robin Berjon
• [HTML5 Ruby] <Segmentation & Categorization> Step 13 really necessary? kawabata taichi

Thursday, 6 March 2014

• [Bug 13113] Parsing algorithm should not preclude Complex Ruby bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

Friday, 21 February 2014

• Re: [counter-styles] i18n-ISSUE-339: Should Japanese spec styles match implementations or vice versa? Tab Atkins Jr.

Saturday, 15 February 2014

• Re: [counter-styles] i18n-ISSUE-339: Should Japanese spec styles match implementations or vice versa? Richard Ishida

Friday, 7 February 2014

• Re: [CSSWG][css-writing-modes] Last Call for Comments on CSS3 Writing Modes fantasai
• Re: [CSSWG][css-writing-modes] Last Call for Comments on CSS3 Writing Modes Aharon (Vladimir) Lanin
• Re: [CSSWG][css-writing-modes] Last Call for Comments on CSS3 Writing Modes fantasai

Tuesday, 28 January 2014

• RE: [css-writing-modes] nit Koji Ishii

Wednesday, 22 January 2014

• Re: Specifying the vertical positioning of the kihon-hanmen James Clark

Tuesday, 21 January 2014

• Re: Specifying the vertical positioning of the kihon-hanmen Martin J. Dürst
• Specifying the vertical positioning of the kihon-hanmen James Clark

Last message date: Monday, 31 March 2014 06:59:53 UTC