W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-cjk@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: [text-decor-3] Emphasis marks and ruby

From: MURAKAMI Shinyu <murakami@antenna.co.jp>
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 03:21:22 +0900
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, CJK discussion <public-i18n-cjk@w3.org>, 'WWW International' <www-international@w3.org>
Message-Id: <20130204032121.BF34.C598BCD7@antenna.co.jp>
fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote on 2013/02/03 17:21:23
> On 02/02/2013 12:54 PM, fantasai wrote:
> > On 02/01/2013 10:33 PM, MURAKAMI Shinyu wrote:
> >>
> >> I think this behavior is much better than to hide ruby in many cases.
> >
> > OK. So, there are several things we could do with the spec, which of these do
> > you recommend?
> >
> > Question 1:
> >
> >    Should we remove allowing to hide ruby when emphasis marks are present?
> >    a) yes
> >    b) no
> 
> Third option:
> 
>       c) Allow hiding emphasis marks when ruby and marks are both present,
>          instead of hiding ruby when both are present.

Yes, c), when stacking ruby and marks is difficult, due to the narrow leading or
the implementation costs.


Shinyu Murakami
Antenna House
Received on Sunday, 3 February 2013 18:21:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 3 February 2013 18:21:52 GMT