W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-cjk@w3.org > July to September 2010

[Bug 10830] i18n comment : Please add support for rb

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 18:33:16 +0000
To: public-i18n-cjk@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1P1NwS-0003VK-59@jessica.w3.org>

Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX

--- Comment #5 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2010-09-30 18:33:15 UTC ---
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please
reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:

Status: Rejected
Change Description: no spec change

You can almost always just style the <ruby>. In practice, it's rare that you'd
want to style the ruby base differently, since the whole point is that the ruby
base looks like the rest of the content.

In any case, that's a styling issue. If it's really a problem, we could always
address this with a pseudo-element. We should probably do that anyway (have a
pseudo-element that can style certain spans of descendants); it's the flip side
of ::outside.

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You reported the bug.
Received on Thursday, 30 September 2010 18:33:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:10:22 UTC