W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-cjk@w3.org > July to September 2010

[Bug 10830] i18n comment : Please add support for rb

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 09:35:02 +0000
To: public-i18n-cjk@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1P1FXa-0000J8-TC@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10830

fantasai <fantasai.bugs@inkedblade.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
                 CC|                            |fantasai.bugs@inkedblade.ne
                   |                            |t
         Resolution|WONTFIX                     |

--- Comment #2 from fantasai <fantasai.bugs@inkedblade.net> 2010-09-30 09:35:02 UTC ---
In addition to the markup compatibility concerns raised above, there's another
one: that having an <rb> element allows styling of the ruby base text
independently of the ruby text. This is needed for example to control line
breaking: depending on type of ruby contents and on the styling of the
document, line breaking may or may not be allowed at otherwise-valid
breakpoints in the ruby base text.

I agree that in the general case, the markup is much simpler if ruby bases are
implied by the <rt> markup. However, in some cases it is necessary to have a
more concrete element to address.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You reported the bug.
Received on Thursday, 30 September 2010 09:35:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 30 September 2010 09:35:06 GMT