http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10838 Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED CC| |hsivonen@iki.fi Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #4 from Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> 2010-09-30 08:28:58 UTC --- It seem to me the (In reply to comment #1) > If we introduced <u> with the semantic "proper name mark", it would just be > used incorrectly by everyone. So doing that would be bad. What concrete badness would ensue? It seems to me that it's backwards to value theoretical purity (it's wrong as a matter of principle to use presentational markup without citing how people would concretely suffer) to override a pragmatic i18n/author concern (that it's easier to underline Chinese characters using <u> than using combining diacritical marks). Reopening. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.Received on Thursday, 30 September 2010 08:29:02 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 30 September 2010 08:29:03 GMT