- From: Ehsan Akhgari <ehsan@mozilla.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 21:35:28 -0400
- To: CE Whitehead <cewcathar@hotmail.com>
- Cc: public-i18n-bidi@w3.org, ntounsi@gmail.com
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 8:53 PM, CE Whitehead <cewcathar@hotmail.com> wrote: > Hi. > >> From: ehsan@mozilla.com >> Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 17:43:17 -0400 >> Subject: Re: [html-bidi] Feedback on Additional Requirements for Bidi in >> HTML >> To: cewcathar@hotmail.com >> CC: public-i18n-bidi@w3.org >> >> It's not about secrets! If HTML specifies a default algorithm, all >> browsers will be using that > From what I gather, from your discussion with Vladmir and > Fantasai, word-count should not be the default algorithm > because it costs a lot of processing -- but if it were set to be the default > algorithm, > instead of first strong, > in your opinion, would all browsers/users/developers then be using > word-count as the algorithm of first choice? I think this issue is mostly moot now. See the proposal for auto[0-9]+. I think that's a much better way to expose this to authors, with best of both worlds. -- Ehsan <http://ehsanakhgari.org/>
Received on Friday, 19 March 2010 01:36:24 UTC