- From: Addison Phillips via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 03:50:33 +0000
- To: public-i18n-archive@w3.org
"if possible" is technically accurate and the wording is extremely careful. The Note @asmusf cites is directly above the note box. However, I agree that this is potentially confusing. I added a new paragraph to the note box: > Users are cautioned that the resulting character sequence can still contain combining marks: not all character sequences have a precomposed equivalent and some scripts depend on combining marks for encoding. There are even cases where a given base character and combining mark are not replaced with a precomposed character because the combination is "blocked" by another combining mark in the sequence. This text does seem a bit repetitious, but maybe that's an advantage? -- GitHub Notification of comment by aphillips Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/charmod-norm/issues/125#issuecomment-339543335 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 26 October 2017 03:50:36 UTC