- From: Shervin Afshar via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 15:27:16 +0000
- To: public-i18n-archive@w3.org
@ebraminio, we discussed this in the meeting, and the opinion is just to add a small sentence to Nastaliq definition to mention Shekasteh Nastaliq as successor and subset of Nastaliq. Since our focus of document is not majorly on calligraphy, dedicated an independent section to Shekasteh would be out of our scope. If you update the PR, we can revisit it next week and merge. Thanks again for your contribution. -- GitHub Notification of comment by shervinafshar Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/alreq/pull/72#issuecomment-248336602 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 20 September 2016 15:27:23 UTC