- From: Shervin Afshar via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 07:02:58 +0000
- To: public-i18n-archive@w3.org
I had a long overdue [action item](https://www.w3.org/International/groups/arabic-layout/track/actions/35) to take a look at transliteration schemes available (ALA vs. UNGEN proposed by Iranian ICSGN National/NCC organizations). I tend to agree that UNGEN scheme of 2012 is more reflective of common transliteration practices; e.g. [Encyclopedia Iranica scheme](http://www.iranicaonline.org/pages/guidelines). As Mostafa mentioned, ALA treatment of "e" and "o" is peculiar. -- GitHub Notification of comment by shervinafshar Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/alreq/issues/16#issuecomment-172759801 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 19 January 2016 07:03:00 UTC