Re: [charmod-norm] Is 'syntactic content' a better term than 'markup'?

i thought about using 'syntax' or 'syntactic elements', and thought 
that 'syntactic content' was better.

'syntax' is for me a bit too general a word, whose dictionary 
definition relates to more than we need.

'syntactic elements' seemed too vague, and when used in charmod-fun 
(once only) i think that 'elements' is just a general word, rather 
than part of a technical term.

'syntactic content' is an unusual pairing which makes it more 
recognisable and specific for what we need, with less chance for 
confusion, but in particular it contrasts with and nicely complements 
'natural language content', which is the term we use for the rest of 
the stuff in a resource.

-- 
GitHub Notif of comment by r12a
See 
https://github.com/w3c/charmod-norm/issues/13#issuecomment-127926894

Received on Wednesday, 5 August 2015 09:14:22 UTC