- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 15:13:49 +0200
- To: Hypertext CG <public-hypertext-cg@w3.org>
- CC: "Levantovsky, Vladimir" <Vladimir.Levantovsky@MonotypeImaging.com>
Hello Hypertext CG, WOFF 1.0 remains in CR, but we are now down to only one failing test (out of 291) for the user agent tests http://w3c-test.org/framework/test/woff-ua/single/directory-4-byte-002/format/xhtml/ http://w3c-test.org/framework/results/woff-ua/ The authoring tools and woff font test suites are green across the board. authoring tools CR criteria met on 24 of 24 tests http://w3c-test.org/framework/review/woff-at/ three implementations (FontSquirrel sfnt2woff woffTools) woff files themselves CR criteria met implementations are the individual woff files we have a validator that tests all spec assertions, http://dev.w3.org/webfonts/WOFF/tools/validator/ and a test suit of 303 tests to exercise the validator http://dev.w3.org/webfonts/WOFF/tests/Format/Tests/xhtml1/testcaseindex.xht validator passes 100% of tests The W3C testing harness has proved to be most useful for these tests. The WOFF validator was recently extended to provide a display of font metadata, such as license and creator information. There has been interesting discussion on a new WOFF 2.0 proposal on www-font, which has improved compression. This is particularly useful for larger fonts such as are used for Japanese and Chinese. The WebFonts WG plans to meet at TPAC. -- Chris Lilley Technical Director, Interaction Domain W3C Graphics Activity Lead, Fonts Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG Member, CSS, WebFonts, SVG Working Groups
Received on Friday, 20 April 2012 13:13:57 UTC