- From: Robin Berjon <robin@robineko.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 16:37:14 +0100
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, Deborah Dahl <dahl@conversational-technologies.com>, public-hypertext-cg <public-hypertext-cg@w3.org>
On Mar 11, 2011, at 15:56 , Chris Lilley wrote: > On Tuesday, March 8, 2011, 6:23:52 PM, Robin wrote: > RB> Pardon my ignorance, but do we still have a Forms WG? Its charter > RB> lists it as having expired in 2009. > > According to the (Member-only,no idea why) list of W3C Working Groups > http://www.w3.org/Member/Mail/ > it ends 2012-03-31 Ah. That's a better source for information. What I did was: 1) Google for "forms working group" 2) Landed on http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/ (which seems legit) 3) Clicked on that very fist sentence "The Forms working group is chartered..." 4) Which brought me to http://www.w3.org/2007/03/forms-charter.html So I guess it's a case of the group's home page being out of date :) > I agree that charters should be updated with revised end dates when groups are extended. But that also seems to have happened: > http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/2009/charter2010 > "End date 31 March 2012" Right, which works great if you got the right charter in the first place. So second suggestion: update old charters to indicate that they are dead. What we have for TR works nicely, I'd like to suggest that we do the same thing for charters. > RB> The TTWG is also marked as having expired in 2009. > > Again from http://www.w3.org/Member/Mail/ > > 2011-03-31 Exactly as above with http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/ and http://www.w3.org/2008/01/timed-text-wg.html! -- Robin Berjon robineko — hired gun, higher standards http://robineko.com/
Received on Friday, 11 March 2011 15:37:45 UTC