- From: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org>
- Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2016 11:50:57 +0200
- To: Dietrich Schulten <ds@escalon.de>
- Cc: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>, Hydra <public-hydra@w3.org>
Why is CRUD bad for REST? A uniform interface should be able to abstract CRUD interactions and make them protocol-independent. I have demonstrated this in the Linked Data Templates paper: https://github.com/AtomGraph/Linked-Data-Templates/tree/master/XML%20London%202016%20paper On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Dietrich Schulten <ds@escalon.de> wrote: > Sorry, forgot the reference to "Crud is bad for ReST": > > [1] > http://www.drdobbs.com/architecture-and-design/crud-is-bad-for-rest/228700407
Received on Saturday, 18 June 2016 09:51:26 UTC