- From: Maik Riechert <maik.riechert@arcor.de>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 09:30:30 +0000
- To: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>, Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Cc: public-hydra@w3.org
+1 to the alternative definition, seems more clean. I always found it strange that the current "view" definition doesn't really contain anything, except the navigation controls. Makes more sense to me to attach those directly to the collection page. Cheers Maik Am 13.01.2016 um 22:46 schrieb Ruben Verborgh: > Dear all, > > Here's a first go at definitions: > > – A collection is a set of members that somehow logically belong together. > – A view is a subset of those members of a collection that satisfy a particular condition. > – A page is a view that selects members based on their position in a specific ordering of the collection. > > Alternative definition of view if it is going to be a subclass of collection: > – A view is a collection which contains those members of a parent collection that satisfy a particular condition. > I would really argue for this, since then we can reuse all the collection stuff on view. > > Best, > > Ruben
Received on Thursday, 14 January 2016 09:30:52 UTC