- From: Karol Szczepański <karol.szczepanski@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 22:10:58 +0100
- To: "Markus Lanthaler" <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>, <public-hydra@w3.org>
Hi Markus
>If you don't like this approach, could you please point out in the examples
>what exactly you don't like. Could you, in that case, please also rewrite
>the examples to illustrate how you would see this working with the
>alternate
>proposal.
>From my perspective is good enough as it doesn't create separate constructs
for paging and filtering - in both examples presented we're using views
which I like. I'd probably prefer to move both to the term of 'filter' (as I
had this conversation with Ruben), but still being consequent here is OK for
me.
The only objection I could made is that whe we're not keen to move the
paging to that templating mechanism as well:
{
"@id": /collection",
"@type": "Collection",
"view": {
"@type": "ViewTemplate",
"template": "/collection{*n,p}",
"mapping": [{
"variable": "n"
"property": "name"
"filter": true
},{
"variable": "p"
"property": "page"
}]
}
}
Cheers
Karol
Received on Tuesday, 12 January 2016 21:10:54 UTC