- From: Tomasz Pluskiewicz <tomasz@t-code.pl>
- Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 08:15:28 +0000
- To: "Pierre-Antoine Champin" <pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr>, "Karol Szczepański" <karol.szczepanski@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Markus Lanthaler" <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>, "Maik Riechert" <maik.riechert@arcor.de>, public-hydra@w3.org
February 12 2016 8:46 AM, "Pierre-Antoine Champin" <pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr> wrote: > ---- > sent from my mobile, please excuse brevity and typos > > Le 11 févr. 2016 11:04 PM, "Karol Szczepański" <karol.szczepanski@gmail.com> a écrit : >> >> Hi > (...) >> > Pierre: That last point being state, I feel sympathy with Ruben's idea that >> > views could be considered as collections of their own. >> I'd be careful about this. While I also stated before that view is a >> collection (or the opposite - collection is a specific view of itself). Only >> issue I started to have about this is how i.e. deleting a member from a view >> affects the "owning" collection? > > Oh, I sure won't go down that path! > Views must be read-only, aren't they? Isn't that a little too strong statement? After all one can treat views as resources of their own. I don't see why a view wouldn't allow the same operations that the base resource does. It may be a matter of preference and Hydra should not make such assumptions IMO Regards, Tom
Received on Friday, 12 February 2016 08:16:40 UTC