- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 20:47:52 +0200
- To: <public-hydra@w3.org>
- Cc: "'James M Snell'" <jasnell@gmail.com>, <public-ldpnext@w3.org>, "'Web Annotation'" <public-annotation@w3.org>
On Tuesday, October 13, 2015 12:24 PM, Robert Sanderson wrote: > The Annotation WG will not use the Triple Pattern Fragments as there's > nothing normative to refer to. Well, I guess there's nothing we can do about this at this stage. > Without the context, it is impossible to know whether the array for > "member" is an rdf:List or just a set of triples with the same > predicate. Without which context? The JSON-LD context? > We have requirements for per item ordering, in every page, > without needing the client to re-order the items based on some > property value. The construction quoted below would either: > > 1. Not fulfill those requirements, if member is a partial set when > retrieving each page > 2. Be incorrect, if member is a different rdf:List instance when > retrieving each page So you prefer to attach the items to a page instead of the collection itself? Btw. rdf:List is not the only way to serialize a list. There also exists the Ordered List Ontology [1] for instance. [1] http://smiy.sourceforge.net/olo/spec/orderedlistontology.html -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Tuesday, 13 October 2015 18:48:17 UTC