- From: John Walker <john.walker@semaku.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 18:41:10 +0100
- To: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
- Cc: elf Pavlik <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>, Maik Riechert <m.riechert@reading.ac.uk>, Hydra <public-hydra@w3.org>
Hi Ruben, On 11 Nov 2015, at 17:27, Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be> wrote: >> IMO using *describedby* Link in HTTP Header, as in LDP, makes a >> reasonable approach >> * http://www.w3.org/TR/ldp/#link-relation-describedby > > +1 on that > > Another option is to negotiate for application/ld+json, > in response to which the server can send a 303 to an about resource. Would 303 be appropriate here if the first resource is a (binary) information resource? > It is important though that the thing and the description about the thing are different. +1 > >> or to send HTTP OPTIONS > > I used to do that, but there are good arguments against it: > http://www.mnot.net/blog/2012/10/29/NO_OPTIONS > > Best, > > Ruben John
Received on Wednesday, 11 November 2015 17:41:54 UTC