- From: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
- Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 11:52:01 +0100
- To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>, John Walker <john.walker@semaku.com>
- Cc: public-linked-data-fragments@w3.org
>> I like that. Another minor tweak >> >> The page MUST use hydra:next to reference the next page. If the next page >> would be (is?) empty, however, it SHOULD NOT be referenced. Good. Any particular reason for "reference" over "link"? I have "would be" because one can discuss whether a next page really exists if it is empty. > So to deconstruct this a little, you are in effect saying: > a. If there is a next page, the current page MUST use hydra:next to reference the next page > b. The first page of a fragment MAY be empty > c. Subsequent pages SHOULD NOT be empty Yes, indeed. That would be an other way to list this. While it is longer, it might be clearer. Markus, what do you think? > Where by 'empty' we mean that the page contains zero data triples. Exactly; I updated the spec recently to explicitly define that. Best, Ruben
Received on Friday, 6 November 2015 10:52:29 UTC