Re: RDF Shapes has published shacl (Shapes Constraint Language) draft

Right you are. I assumed (after only a cursory scan of both docs) that
actions would be properties but I see no examples of that as I look again.

Looks like this is about defining constraints for sharing objects/graphs in
triple form.

Thanks for keeping me straight ;)
 On Mar 21, 2015 2:13 PM, "Erik Wilde" <dret@berkeley.edu> wrote:

> hello mike.
>
> On 2015-03-21 13:37, mca wrote:
>
>> Hmm... A bit of a cross between a schema and a WSDL.
>>
>
> i am wondering where you see something WSDLish in SHACL. to me, it looks
> like a pretty straightforward to look at a metamodel's concepts, and then
> design a variety of features that can constrain data in ways that hopefully
> make it most useful for real-life tasks.
>
> what i am crucially missing so far is any kind of wildcard mechanism,
> which to me would be absolutely essential for a language for real-life
> scenarios. maybe i am just not seeing them, if so, could somebody point
> them out, please? thanks!
>
>  Good for getting
>> details of a single implementation, but the reliance on cardinality and
>> enumerated types, etc. limits wide use beyond a single service
>> implementation.
>>
>
> maybe this is the same comment i was making above in terms of a missing
> wildcard mechanism? if not, what else are you missing?
>
> cheers,
>
> dret.
>
> --
> erik wilde | mailto:dret@berkeley.edu  -  tel:+1-510-2061079 |
>            | UC Berkeley  -  School of Information (ISchool) |
>            | http://dret.net/netdret http://twitter.com/dret |
>