Re: Describing headers accepted by a supported operation

On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 6:44 PM, Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
wrote:
>
> > Yes, that's true. At the moment, the main advantage of using hydra
> > with LDP is the fact that it makes it possible to describe the
> > expected content for each operation (without using a custom media
> > type) which is not possible with LDP until the RDF Data Shapes WG
> > comes with a proper solution. However, being able to describe about
> > headers is useful too. For example, the slug header is a MAY and some
> > servers may support it while others may not. At the moment, there is
> > no way to find it out without trial and error.
>
> This seems like a reasonable enhancement to me. I'm offline at the moment.
> Could you please file an issue in case I forget to do it when I'm online
> again?
>

Thanks Markus. I've filed the issue at
https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/issues/99

Best Regards,
Nandana