- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 22:20:40 +0200
- To: "'Ruben Verborgh'" <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>, "'Miel Vander Sande'" <miel.vandersande@ugent.be>
- Cc: "'John Walker'" <john.walker@semaku.com>, "'Tom Johnson'" <tom@dp.la>, <public-hydra@w3.org>
On 12 Jun 2015 at 10:37, Ruben Verborgh wrote: >> Only results of CONSTRUCT >> (and thus not SELECT, DESCRIBE or ASK) SPARQL queries >> are considered Linked Data Fragments. +1, appears to be the simplest "solution". > While this is indeed the clarifying explanation, > I would rather have it outside of the definition then. What do you mean by that? >> DESCRIBE is an informative part of the SPARQL 1.1 spec and is therefore quite > unpredictable. > > Agree, but note that Linked Data documents are equally unpredictable. > I.e., you don't get just <s> ?p ?o triples back; typically, also some ?o ?p <s> triples. > So following that argument, we could also include DESCRIBE queries. > > However, for the sake of clarity and simplicity (it's an example anyway), > I would prefer the clarifying remark suggested above. > Would that work? Yes. We should also create a Wiki page (LDF FAQs?) capturing why this decision has been made resp. what the arguments are. -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Monday, 15 June 2015 20:21:11 UTC