- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 20:48:34 +0100
- To: "'Hydra'" <public-hydra@w3.org>
On 5 Jan 2015 at 20:37, Markus Lanthaler wrote: > On 5 Jan 2015 at 11:33, Ruben Verborgh wrote: >>> Thinking about it again, it might actually make sense to introduce >>> such a class as it could help us to improve documentation of the >>> vocabulary. >> >> Great. Proposed spec changes: >> https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/issues/85 > > That was quick :-) Thanks. I'll first send out a call for consensus before > merging this though. Actually, we try to avoid having a property and a class which differ only in their capitalization. Should we follow Schema.org's convention and name this hydra:VariableRepresentationType instead of just hydra:VariableRepresentation We probably run into similar cases in the future and would be good to establish a consistent pattern. -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Monday, 5 January 2015 19:48:59 UTC