- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 20:37:53 +0100
- To: "'Hydra'" <public-hydra@w3.org>
On 5 Jan 2015 at 11:33, Ruben Verborgh wrote: >> Thinking about it again, it might actually make >> sense to introduce such a class as it could help us to improve documentation >> of the vocabulary. > > Great. Proposed spec changes: > https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/issues/85 That was quick :-) Thanks. I'll first send out a call for consensus before merging this though. >> BasicRepresentation and ExplicitRepresentation would be >> instances of VariableRepresentation though and not subclasses. > > They never should have been classes in the first place; > that was a modeling error I accidentally introduced. > Given that they are indeed instances, > it does make sense to have some class for them. ... and they should also be instance of hydra:Resource, not subclasses thereof, right? -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Monday, 5 January 2015 19:38:17 UTC