W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-hydra@w3.org > January 2015

RE: Introduce VariableRepresentation class (was: variable representations edited for spec)

From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 20:37:53 +0100
To: "'Hydra'" <public-hydra@w3.org>
Message-ID: <038301d0291f$199737d0$4cc5a770$@gmx.net>
On 5 Jan 2015 at 11:33, Ruben Verborgh wrote:
>> Thinking about it again, it might actually make
>> sense to introduce such a class as it could help us to improve
>> of the vocabulary.
> Great. Proposed spec changes:
> https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/issues/85

That was quick :-) Thanks. I'll first send out a call for consensus before
merging this though.

>> BasicRepresentation and ExplicitRepresentation would be
>> instances of VariableRepresentation though and not subclasses.
> They never should have been classes in the first place;
> that was a modeling error I accidentally introduced.
> Given that they are indeed instances,
> it does make sense to have some class for them.

... and they should also be instance of hydra:Resource, not subclasses
thereof, right?

Markus Lanthaler
Received on Monday, 5 January 2015 19:38:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:29:44 UTC