- From: Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu>
- Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 11:01:41 -0700
- To: László Lajos Jánszky <laszlo.janszky@gmail.com>
- CC: Ryan McDonough <ryan@damnhandy.com>, Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>, "public-hydra@w3.org" <public-hydra@w3.org>
hello lászló.
On 2014-09-10, 10:46 , László Lajos Jánszky wrote:
> Actually I am not so sure that we need a new query language for this.
> I mean it could be any existing query language, for example SPARQL in
> an URL serialized form. But we have to describe the parameters
> somehow... Not an easy task...
the world has very many query languages because the world has very many
ways how data is managed and can be queried. assuming that there will be
the one query language to end all query languages is not backed up by
reality.
my suggestion would be to embrace diversity and make sure that there is
a way how specific capabilities and interaction modalities can be
represented and communicated, so that clients understand that a certain
resource does support a certain query language.
loose coupling does allow you to do that, and media types would be a
good way to accomplish this.
cheers,
dret.
--
erik wilde | mailto:dret@berkeley.edu - tel:+1-510-2061079 |
| UC Berkeley - School of Information (ISchool) |
| http://dret.net/netdret http://twitter.com/dret |
Received on Wednesday, 10 September 2014 18:02:12 UTC