RE: totalItems vs void:triples

On 15 Okt 2014 at 22:42, Ruben Verborgh wrote:
>> To be honest, not really but my gut feeling is that using
hydra:totalItems
>> should be fine.
> 
> I guess I will eventually make that the default then,
> with the VoID equivalent as a recommendation.
> 
> (Note: perhaps we should say something at hydra:totalItems,
> maybe even make the relation explicit in the vocabulary.)

You mean something about the relationship between hydra:totalItems and
void:triples? Is there really a relationship between the two in the general
case, i.e., in non-LDF use cases?


>> IWhat's your experience regarding the accuracy of the
>> triple count? Are there implementations that are far off?
> 
> Current implementations seem exact for low numbers
> and within 10% error margin for large numbers.

What kind of backends produces those 10% "errors"?


--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler

Received on Monday, 27 October 2014 14:15:34 UTC