- From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 15:33:30 -0400
- To: public-hydra@w3.org
On 06/03/2014 02:39 PM, Markus Lanthaler wrote: > You do realize that we have both "operation" and "supportedOperation" > at the moment, right? "operation" is used to describe what operations > are supported by that specific resource whereas "supportedOperation" > allows to describe what operations are supported by all instances of > the class it is used on (or all values of the property it is used > on). In that sense, supportedProperties is consistent at it tells you > what properties that server supports for instances of that class. A small naming suggestion: If I'm understanding correctly, both "operation" and "supportedOperation" describe what operations are supported, but one describes what operations are supported a specific instance whereas the other describes what operations are supported by all instances of the class. If that is the distinction, I would suggest choosing names that somehow reflect that distinction. Thanks, David
Received on Tuesday, 3 June 2014 19:34:03 UTC