W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-hydra@w3.org > July 2014

RE: Call for consensus on renaming readonly/writeonly to readable/writeable (ISSUE-14)

From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 20:49:55 +0200
To: <public-hydra@w3.org>
Message-ID: <01a101cfa514$95dd7000$c1985000$@gmx.net>
On 16 Jul 2014 at 19:33, Gregg Kellogg wrote:
> On Jul 16, 2014, at 10:20 AM, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
>> Currently, it is possible to declare a property to be readonly and
>> at the same time. By renaming these properties to readable/writeable it
>> become impossible
>> create such inconsistencies. Thus, the proposal is thus to rename
>> readonly/writeonly to readable/writeable.
> +1, and I would say that readable=false and writable=false basically says
> that this property is unsupported, which may be reasonable for subclasses
> which such properties don't make sense. It's also similar to saying that
> cardinality=0.

Good point. I'm currently on a plane, could you please add a comment to the
issue so that we don't forget about this when updating the spec.


Markus Lanthaler
Received on Monday, 21 July 2014 18:50:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:29:42 UTC