Re: Semantic Domination

On 11 July 2014 10:32, Lee Curtis <lee.curtis@me.com> wrote:

>
> Hi All,
>
> Thanks for your hard work on Hydra-CG. I was working on similar, so great
> to see I can focus on core logic again :-)
>
> I believe Hydra is a major step forward to semantic interoperability with
> the RoTW (rest of the world) .
>
> A couple of initial observations:
>
> My team and I prefer N3 notation. I understand JSON-LD aligns more with
> target audience of web developers. Fair call.
>

+1

Would love to see more support for turtle / n3.  Not that there's anything
wrong with JSON LD.


>
> In my domain, both the server and client will share the same Hydra
> “contract".
>
> I’m keen to work with IRITemplates but not sure how they link to
> hydra:Class.
>
> FYI: I have quite a few APIs that I want to abstract via properties, and
> use the template to instantiate them.
>
> I’d love to see some worked examples, ideally in N3/Turtle (since a more
> real-world semantic model is easier to read in a clean triple notation,
> JSON-LD seems OK for snippets or during transport)
>
> Showing my ignorance ...
>
> AFAICT, I can query for all templates that have properties in common with
> my hydra:Class (my Endpoint/Servlet?). But since the IRITemplates link via
> IRITemplateMapping via Properties - it seems ambiguous.
>
> Anyways,  well done :-) Looking forward to getting it all wired up and
> working ...
>
> Best Regards
>
> -lee-
>
> FYI: Our App is at: http://www.scorpio4.com/ - we have more code / tests
> /docs to add, but an initial public release is set for end of July.
>
>