W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-hydra@w3.org > July 2014

Re: Call for consensus on collection design (ISSUE-41)

From: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2014 10:25:57 +0200
Cc: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>, "public-hydra@w3.org" <public-hydra@w3.org>
Message-Id: <F264B7CA-86C8-4D59-9B54-08D05DAA5E8E@ugent.be>
To: "McBennett, Pat" <McBennettP@DNB.com>
> Well, I certainly thought Ruben wanted to mint an IRI for the 'manages block' too, but maybe all he wanted was as you state above.

Minting an IRI is not really necessary for me; but any publisher can of course decide to consistently do that.

However, I think what Gregg said on another thread is more important:

> Make it a best practice that a Collection serialization include the hydra:manages block inline, rather than requiring an additional GET

So even if it has its own IRI, it should not be necessary for a client to dereference it.

Received on Friday, 4 July 2014 08:26:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:29:42 UTC