W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-hydra@w3.org > July 2014

Re: Call for consensus on collection design (ISSUE-41)

From: Andreas Kuckartz <a.kuckartz@ping.de>
Date: 3 Jul 2014 21:22:47 +0200
Message-ID: <53B5AD87.5070108@ping.de>
To: "Ruben Verborgh" <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
Cc: "public-hydra@w3.org" <public-hydra@w3.org>
Ruben Verborgh:
>> A question:
>>
>> What about using
>>
>>  "managesProperty": "schema:knows",
>>  "managesSubject": "/alice"
>>
>> instead of
>>
>>  "manages": {
>>    "property": "schema:knows",
>>    "subject": "/alice"
>>  }
>
> Only the latter has possibilities for easy extension with existing
> properties; the former requires inventing new properties for each
> step.

I am well aware of the importance of extension points. But how important
is this one? Is it worth the additional property and blank nodes (and a
little bit of additional structural complexity)?

> Plus, the "manages" object should be interpreted as a whole;
> only managesProperty / managesSubject isn't meaningful.

The same is true for "property" / "subject".

Cheers,
Andreas
Received on Thursday, 3 July 2014 19:23:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:29:42 UTC