- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 13:59:26 -0500
- To: public-hydra@w3.org
- Message-ID: <52F1388E.10909@openlinksw.com>
On 2/4/14 1:26 PM, Markus Lanthaler wrote: > This is a general problem of RDF. AFAICT, there's no way general way to > solve this issue for sets. If you would use a list, you could at least use > the list's head node (which generally is a blank node). Remember our > discussions in the JSON-LD group? > > Both Schema.org with its ItemList and Hydra with its Collection take a > rather pragmatic approach. We could of course go ahead and define a > Collection's semantics so that I assume you've looked at RDF Schema vocabulary which does describe RDF Collections [1] and Containers [2]. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/#ch_collectionvocab [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/#ch_containervocab . -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Tuesday, 4 February 2014 18:59:48 UTC