Re: [Specifications] Indicate a partial collection view is ordered (#172)

> looking at how the Linked Data Platform is doing it

The LDP quote seems to suggest that the client should be responsible for sorting the container members in-memory? As in, fetch 1 million members and sort in the browser?

Maybe I'm misreading it. Is it placed out of context?

> that is not an argument for now supporting this small addition to the spec in Hydra.

It is because Hydra should not just be a set of various (potentially impractical) descriptions but also the way for generic clients to consume them. It is a bad idea to standardise descriptions which cannot be easily coded against IMO. That's why I think we should first consider the desired result and then figure out the **standard** solution

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by tpluscode
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/issues/172#issuecomment-555426493 using your GitHub account

Received on Tuesday, 19 November 2019 09:57:27 UTC