- From: Karol Szczepański via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 19:12:04 +0000
- To: public-hydra-logs@w3.org
It seems that my last `correct` example is not quite `correct`. Indeed, `hydra:supportedOperation` is used in some of the examples directly on the property rather than the supported property and the spec does not touch that matter directly. Also the raw RDF representation of the vocabulary is not that clear about it. During last call at 2018.05.28 we decided we won't change that approach with having a supported operation attached on the property, but we will add a note to the spec regarding the fact, that such statement should be considered as API specific and aggregators should use a limited trust policy to such statements. It's due to fact that attaching a supported operation to a shared vocavulary's term would mean that all occurances of such a property would have that operation available, which is clearly untrue. -- GitHub Notification of comment by alien-mcl Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/issues/196#issuecomment-497071687 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 29 May 2019 19:12:06 UTC