- From: Tomasz Pluskiewicz via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 20:54:24 +0000
- To: public-hydra-logs@w3.org
I do agree. Without more concrete example it's hard to judge the intentions. I meant this remarks as precaution that schema.org for example has no place in the Core. It could, however, be a part of an auxiliary vocabulary, to be used together with Hydra, to define image-specific constraints. The problem as I understand it, is that we'd want to describe constraints for non-RDF payloads using RDF structures. In the example you were discussing, describe specifics of an image file using `schema:ImageObject`. schema.org would not be the only possibility. And similar could be done with other media files (audio, video). -- GitHub Notification of comment by tpluscode Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/pull/186#issuecomment-463791871 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 14 February 2019 20:54:26 UTC