Re: [Specifications] Stop advocating the use of the unmaintained and not dereferencable VOID vocabulary?

> As an aside, a question I've never fully found an answer to myself: is dcterms really the final one? Because there's also two versions of `dc`: http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/, http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.0/.

In the Linked Data world I see a convergence to the use of the more extensive dcterms over all other versions.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by pietercolpaert
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/issues/170#issuecomment-440687958 using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2018 14:46:16 UTC